While traveling last week, I stayed with a friend who grew up in
When I got home, I looked to see what more about the current debate. I couldn’t find anything too recent, but I did find an article at time.com from August of 2008 discussing the ending of the ban, and the possible ramifications of that ending (http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1831786,00.html). The debate revolves about whether a new German edition should be released containing annotations that explain where Hitler got the information he used. The pro side believes that releasing such a book would exorcise the mystique surrounding the book, diminishing any potential power it might have. The con side believes that releasing the book in any form believes that there isn’t a demand for the book and, for those that want to read it, it is available on the Internet.
There does not appear to be a consensus at this point as to what the state of
The whole situation has made me think about one of the unintended benefits of attempting to ban books: it makes them irresistibly interesting. My friend said he never would have picked up Mein Kampf if it hadn’t been banned in
I’m certainly not advocating that books should be banned, but as long as it’s happening, I guess I’m trying to see a silver lining. I still hope for the day when everyone respects the rights of others to self-determine what is appropriate for themselves, but until that happens, I’m going to hang on to my silver lining.
1 comment:
I totally agree that trying to ban a book can be counterproductive and I appreciate looking at the positive side. As for Mein Kampf and making an official copy release... I know there is the historical issue with Mein Kampf but shouldn't the fact that it was banned be a moot point? Just as a decision to purchase a book for a collection should not be based on whether or not it is controversial but whether it fits the mission of the library and it's selection policy?
Post a Comment